Practical Reviews

Remove PIVC if No IV Therapy Is Indicated to Enhance Comfort, Minimize Complications

Key PickKey Reviews are selected for their clinical importance or significance and are marked with a key icon.

Background: Peripheral IV catheters (PIVCs) are common in hospitalized patients, but approximately one-third are not actively used. One-third of PIVCs placed in the emergency department are never used. Because they are so common, they account for 30% of catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections and 20% of all S aureus bloodstream infections. Pain, phlebitis, and vascular damage occur with 10% to 20% of peripheral IVs. They can be problematic in agitated delirious patients and burdensome to maintain. Hospitalists may feel peripheral access is necessary in case emergent IV therapy is required. Objective: To review when the benefit of PIVCs outweighs risk. Design: Literature review in the "Things We Do For No Reason™" series. Discussion: The authors report that 10% of PIVCs in 1 survey were malfunctioning, and 30% failed before the end of therapy. Interosseous (IO) IV access was used in 20% of emergent cardiac resuscitations with no difference in outcomes. PIVCs are more...

Want to read the full article?

To view, you must be an active Practical Reviews subscriber.
Login or subscribe now.